HISTORY OF THE CANE CORSO

Author
Renzo Carosio

 

The story of the Cane Corso, coincides extraordinarily with the history of the Italic peoples, in all the splendor and their misery. Unfortunately this race, saved in the last few years from what seemed an inexorable and fatal decline, reaches us with a scanty but still significant historical and iconographic background from which a few enthusiasts have tried to reconstruct the origins of this race. The etymology of the name Corso is still uncertain. The most credible hypothesis are those which indicate Greek origins: KORTOS = wall and from the Latin: COHORS = guard of the courtyard. Until recently the oldest documentation citing the name of the Cane Corso, consisted of a few poems and some prose dating from 1500. In 1998 the A.I.C.C. or Associazione Italiana Cane Corso published a study on the race which brought to light the military use of the Cane Corso, in 1137 in Monopoli di Sabina (near Rome) , the finding of kennels from the period and the close links between the race and Roman history. All of this allows us to consider the Cane Corso, as the principal evidence of an ancestral race which has maintained particular characteristics over the centuries, which take us back in time, not just to the period tied to agricultural economy immediately prior to the industrial revolution, but even further back linking dog fanciers with the great civilizations of the past; the rise and fall of the Roman empire, the middle ages and modern times.

 

The Cane Corso, has maintained through natural selection over the centuries, the closest possible contact with environment and the roles which man has asked this precious companion to play. We are talking about hard times when the success and survival of a race depended exclusively on their ability to render work, so the choice of raising and keeping a dog was a purely economic one. A responsibility taken which had to correspond to the acquisition of a good or service, nothing superfluous was allowed. The Cane Corso, which we can admire today is the best evidence of the theory which sustains that when a race exhibits certain morphological and behavioral characteristics relating to the work it is required to do, then that race shows harmony of form and balanced character. The past of the Cane Corso, is not only largely present and alive but also extraordinarily current, as if time had just slipped away. The Corso has conserved from its ancestors the Molossi of Epiro and the pugnaces of Rome, used in war and for fighting in the circus, the aggressive and combative nature necessary for successfully reaching its goal, with no hesitation and with surprising potential force. Through contact with man in social situations he has learned to react only when necessary, becoming an excellent interpreter of human gestures. With these characteristics the Cane Corso, has survived until today. In small settlements in the south of Italy where they have maintained an archaic system of agriculture and a multi purpose dog is an essential partner.

 

The modernization of agriculture and systems of breeding, in particular the disappearance of breeding in the wild and semi-wild state. The disappearance of wild game and the use of firearms with the consequently different techniques of hunting have reduced the traditional uses of the Cane Corso. It is for this reason that the diffusion of the Corso has suffered drastic reduction since the Second World War. The situation at the beginning of the 1970s was worrying for the very survival of the race, then reduced to a modest number of examples and no longer considered by in official dog-fancying circles despite the efforts of individuals like the Count Bonatti and Professor Ballotta. It was in the 1976 that an enthusiastic dog lover and researcher of the rural traditions of Italy, Doctor Breber, brought the Cane Corso, to the attention of the public and official dog fancying circles in an article published in a number of the ENCI (Italian Kennel Club) magazine. He followed this first step with the setting up of a rescue mission carried out by a group of enthusiasts who had made contact with Dr. Breber in the meantime.

 

In October of 1983 these enthusiasts formed the S.A.C.C. (Società Amatori Cane Corso). The common intentions of rescuing the race were the basis for the forming of the SACC, which suffered its first shock in 1986 when Dr. Breber abandoned the society. This fact has little resonance at the time as the group was not well known and lived on the edges of dog-fancying officialdom. This was a determining factor in the future direction of the race as was the contribution of the man who was among the first to contribute to the new interest in the race and who provided the dogs for the first litter: Basir the model for the standard of the race was the son of Dauno and Tipsi, two dogs chosen by Dr. Breber. When Dr. Breber left the SACC centered itself around the kennels in Mantova run by Giancarlo Malavasi with the entire breeding program of the race and the running of the SACC in the hands of Stefano Gandolfi, Gianantonio Sereni and Ferdinando Casolino. The need to move the breeding program forward at all costs become the justification for centralized running of the association which was not very democratic and often object of not positive chattering. For these reasons the SACC, two vice-presidents from different times stand out, Mr. Oreste Savoia and Dr. Flavio Bruno. In this period it must be highlighted that the activities of the SACC for the recognition of the Cane Corso were carried out with energy and appreciable results. Unfortunately the same cannot be said from the dog fanciers point of view because the level of quality of the litter thrown by Basir in 1980 were never repeated and the subjects produced, appeared and today still appear distant from the desired model and show considerable variation. In that period the SACC successfully organized dog fanciers meetings with the scope of making the race known and allow the judges of the ENCI to carry out tests and measurements.

 

This activity produced an official standard document edited by Dr. Antonio Morsiani ratified by the judging committee of the ENCI in 1987. In the same edition of the standard, perhaps because of the need to differentiate the Cane Corso as much as possible from the other Italian Molosso hounds, the Neapolitan Mastiff, for the purposes of recognition, some inaccuracies were allowed which led to considerable discussion. The most important regards the closure of the teeth in that the standard requires a slight prognathism. The level bite is only tolerated, however being just as common in the Corso. This is shown not only in the many positions taken by enthusiastic breeders (including Breber) but also in the official records of the first convention, Convegno nazionale di Civitella Affadena, June 16th 1990. In 1992 in order to better follow the evolution of the Race the ENCI decided to record the births of Corsi born of parents verified by the judges and as such considered heads of blood lines, in an unofficial book called the Libro Apperto or open book. The data contained in this book was transferred into the official books when the race was officially recognized on January 20th 1994.

 

The enthusiasm for this race, the curiosity and the knowledge that a greater number of dogs and a greater interest in the race would have helped in the push for recognition, lead to an uncontrolled increase in the production of litters with a consequent reduction in the average quality of the offspring. In this phase the SACC, not only omitted take any action to inhibit this phenomenon, but rather took every opportunity to publicize the race and themselves as its saviors. Under this pressure the number of Corsi produced jumped from a few tens of animals at the beginning to the current 2500 annual registrations. Given the lack of improvement in the quality of the animals produced the success of the race was vaunted in terms of numerical increase. This choice penalizing the zootecnical aspects paid of in terms of political ratification. On May 22nd 1996 at Arese the best Cane Corso were gathered. CH Boris was used as the model for the presentation of the characteristics of the race at the upper levels of the F.C.I. A few months later in November 1996 the Cane Corso was recognized at an international level.

Temperamental Journey

Pondering the time-forged character of the Cane Corso

By Michael Ertaskiran

The word “character” comes from the Greek word kharaktērm, which means a “stamping tool.” It’s the sum of mental and personality traits that define – and, yes, stamp – an individual, both human or dog. And to fully explore the Cane Corso’s character, we need to understand where he came from and how he developed. 

Glimpses of this type of dog’s character can be seen vividly in the bas-reliefs and terracotta statues of ancient Mesopotamia. His fierceness transcends time to reveal a formidable and capable dog: The reliefs in particular depict hunting scenes with huge mastiff-type dogs hunting large game. These terracotta statues were intended to ward off evil spirits and bore names that telegraphed the temperaments of the subjects: “Don’t hesitate; use your jaws.” “Conquer the enemy.” “Bite the opposition.” “Eliminator of cowards.” “Grand barker.” And “the howling assistant.” 

 

Unquestionably, the Cane Corso is Molosser. More so than probably any other breed, he is heir to the Molossian/Epirean dynasty, alongside his very close relative the Neapolitan Mastiff. Molossian dogs were probably more flock guardians than war dogs, in the sense that they protected livestock from wolves and bandits, which not coincidentally is one aspect of the Cane Corso’s historical function. Among the ancient Greeks, Aristole knew of the Molossus: “In Molossis there is a breed of dog, which serves as a guardian of the herds, which distinguishes itself from all other dogs, through its size and indomitable courage against wild animals,” he wrote. In the Greek poem Cynegetica (“On Hunting”), attributed to Oppian, the Molossian is described as “impetuous and of steadfast valor, who attacked even bearded bulls and rush upon monstrous boars and destroy them … they are not swift but they have abundant spirit and genuine strength unspeakable and dauntless courage.” Ancient Rome’s poet Virgil wrote of these dogs: “Never with them on guard need you fear for your stalls, a midnight thief, or onslaught of wolves, or Iberian brigands at your back.” 

 

It is believed that the Molossians arrived in Greece during the Greco-Persian wars, with Persian king Xerxes the Great around 499 BC. When the Greeks colonized Italy, they brought these large dogs with them. When the Romans in turn conquered Italy, they discovered the Molossiod dogs’ virtues, and they renamed them Pugnaces because of their willingness to fight. As was their way, the Romans improved on what they assimilated. They divided dogs into three categories: celeries, which ran down wild animals; pugnaces, which attacked wild animals, and villatici, which guarded farms. These “groups” of dogs can be roughly translated into what would be modern-day Hounds, the Cane Corso and the Neapolitan Mastiff, respectively. 

 

To augment the Canis Pugnaces’ abilities, dogs from England were brought back to the Empire. The Romans, who had met the Pugnaces Britanniae in battle during their European campaigns, had come to value their indomitable fighting spirit, and crossbred these “imports” with the Roman Pugnaces. 

 

After the fall of the Roman Empire, the Pugnaces found a home in the rural Italian countryside. Melting seamlessly into “civilian” life, his natural gifts served him well as a squire to feudal lords during the hunt or battle. We are fortunate that extensive iconography remains in the form of paintings, engravings, coins and sketches that wonderfully illustrates the breed’s utilizations during this period. You can see the rage in the eyes of the boar, and feel the rush of battle as the knight and his trusted auxiliary take part in a pitched battle. Or, in quieter times, you can observe a gentleman relaxing in a town square as his trusted companion dozes at his feet. 

 

The Cane Corso and his talents, forged by the Romans, were perfectly suited to the labors of farm life. This dog was unconquerable, tenacious, resistant to pain and eager to serve humans. His temperament was pliable, and his physical capabilities considerable. He was versatile enough to confront a bull or wild boar, but respectful enough to not chase the chickens nor drink the goat milk. All these factored into his salvation. He found a home with the massaro, or peasant farmer, of the meridone of southern Italy, where he shared in his everyday labor. The Cane Corso would not exist today if not for the proud and guarded people of the old south, who employed him and used him to his full potential. 

 

The ancestors of the Cane Corso found their true calling on the farms of the southern Italian countryside. Their natural inherited gifts were honed to make an indispensable aid to the massaro. The land and work were very hard, and it required both hard people and hard dogs. The word cors’ – which translates as “sturdy” – is an appropriate description of both man and dog. This was by no means an easy existence, and only the strongest survived or were fed. The weak dogs were discarded and not allowed to reproduce. If a Corso didn’t work, he didn’t eat. Natural selection also played its part, as the strongest, most dominant dogs naturally assumed the leadership role in reproduction. This ensured that characteristics like courage, intelligence, speed, strength and agility passed from one generation to the next through a strong genetic patrimony. 

 

Generally a bitch would only be allowed to raise four puppies, and a first-time mother only two. After the first week the massaro would choose the strongest and sturdiest of the get, whose tails would then be cut. Some preferred to allow the bitch to choose: She was tied up and the litter removed from the whelping area; once released, she was allowed to tend to her brood, and the first puppies she chose to “save” were regarded as the strongest or healthiest. The ears were cropped at three months old without anesthesia and disinfected with ashes. It was customary to fry the amputated part of the ear in olive oil and flour and feed it to the puppies. This practice was believed to heighten aggression and sharpen the temperament. 

 

The primary utilizations of the breed where that of hunter, farm dog/flock guardian and personal protector. As a hunter, the Cane Corso was used on big game such as stag, boar, bear and badger. During the hunt, the Corso was held back as the scent dogs flushed out the game; when the prey was cornered the Corsos were unleashed, attacking and incapacitating it until the hunter came to give the death blow by gun or spear. 

 

Though it is a true Molosser, the Cane Corso needs to be athletic in order to do the jobs it was bred to do, from hunting to droving livestock. 

 

Life on the farm was varied, depending on the region’s socioeconomics. With pigs, the Corso assisted with breeding and castration. He was sent into the thicket to incapacitate the semi-wild sow after she delivered so the farmer could collect the piglets harmlessly and bring them onto the farm. In the same manner, using his immovable bite the Cane Corso would seize the boar by the ear to immobilize him for castration. With cattle, he was used to drive the herd to the butcher for slaughter. (Interesting enough, I have had many of my dogs “herding instinct tested” and all received the same comments: “Would excel as a driver of cattle.” Some of those gifts are still being passed down!) 

The bull was castrated in the same manner as the boar: The Cane Corso grabbed him by the ear or snout with his cast-iron jaws and serrated bite. This was quite a spectacle and evolved into an almost circus-like atmosphere, as villagers would come to watch and applaud the agile and robust Corso as he avoided the horns of the angry bull and conquered him. This scenario is not exclusive to the Cane Corso or Italy, as it was practiced by many breeds in many different parts of the world. 

 

The breed’s role as a flock guardian was similar to that of his ancient forefathers; he was used to prevent poaching from brigands and cattle thieves as well as his natural enemy, the wolf. Not being “born in the net,” the Cane Corso did not have a profound attachment to sheep; his primary love is and was humans. In some cases a cross breeding was necessary, which was referred to as a mezzo-Corso. A cross between a male Corso and a female Abruzze Mastiff (Italian sheep dog, or Maremma) created a dog capable of fighting the wolf but with an attachment to the sheep. The puppies were born among the herd and lived out their days there. 

 

The breed’s guardian duties also included accompanying merchants or butchers by cart so they would not be robbed on the trail as they sold their wares. During the off season, lone wardens guarded the vine land with all the workers gone due to fear of malaria, which was rampant in the Italian south; their sole companion was the Cane Corso. These “teams” would develop an almost telepathic relationship due to their close bond. 

 

The Cane Corso was so prized by the people of these regions that there are several metaphors and phrases associated with his name. Can corso referred to a man of proud aspect and attitude. Je’nu cors is what an elderly peasant would say to describe a young man who was the essence of moral and physical virtue, according to a book of Sicilian proverbs by Emma Alaima. The saying A cani corsi nun ci diri’ngirri roughly translates as “Don’t incite one who is already irascible.” 

 

So ingrained was the Cane Corso in the rural southern Italian landscape, and so tied was he to those whom he served, that this question from Dr. Flavio Bruno, an early champion of the recovery of the breed, immediately comes to mind: “Do qualities of the man describe the dog, or do those of the dog describe the man?” 

 

During the breed’s recovery period in Italy, its physical measurements and morphological characteristics were of course evaluated, but so was its temperament. The parameters used were: 

 

DOCILITY – This indicates the dog’s natural tendency of accepting humans as its hierarchical superiors. This does not mean that the Corso has to be a human’s slave, but instead that it simply accepts human guidance. Docility should not be confused with shyness or fear. 

SOCIABILITY – A sociable dog fits in any environment without any problem, with naturalness and spontaneity, and is capable of communicating without hesitation. The absence of sociability shows up with fear and with an anxious and worried attitude. 

TEMPERAMENT – This corresponds to the intensity and quickness of the dog’s reaction to external stimuli of every kind. 

CURIOSITY – This reflects the dog’s will, pleasure and capability of being interested in everything that surrounds him in a very natural way. Exploring new territories and environments is at the basis of his attitude. Associated with docility and sociability, curiosity sometimes can impact an individual’s ability to learn by imitation. 

WATCHFULNESS – This represents the dog’s sensitivity in perceiving an external danger capable of menacing himself and his pack, which, in a domestic situation, is the human family. Sometimes, watchfulness tied to his peculiar olfactory and auditory sensitivity allows the dog to anticipate a natural event like a thunderstorm or earthquake. 

FIBER – This gives the measure of an individual’s attitude in resisting every external action of an unpleasant nature. Fiber is inversely proportional to docility. 

POSSESSIVENESS – A possessive dog is predisposed to become the owner of something or someone. It derives from predatory behavior, which is still present in wild dogs but absent in domestic ones. Possessiveness shows up in puppies as an expression of their competitiveness. 

COMBATIVENESS – This corresponds to the capability of fighting vigorously against an unpleasant external stimulus. It is often associated to possessiveness, particularly in the puppy. 

AGGRESSIVENESS – This is a physical reaction against a danger that threatens the integrity of the dog’s territory, his own safety or his fellow dogs’ safety. In wild dogs, this behavior is also useful for providing food, and so is bound to a predatory behavior no longer present in domestic dogs. 

COURAGE – A courageous dog is willing to confront unknown situations he could avoid in the interest of his own integrity. Courage is directly proportional to sociability and temperament without being in contrast to docility or being necessarily bound to aggressiveness. 

 

Mario Perricone, one of the judges involved in the breed’s recovery and former president of the ENCI judges committee, wrote an interesting article on what the Cane Corso’s psychological map should be based on these behaviors as well on as on Austrian zoologist Konrad Lorenz’s theories on neotenia, or the retention of juvenile traits in adults. 

 

“The Corso has been a defense dog, therefore characterized by great docility and sociability. In fact, these dogs must love man very much to defend him and move among people without any fear,” Perricone surmised. “Reaction times to external stimuli are limited to the moments when they are together with man. Curiosity is a little more accentuated, while watchfulness is less, since it only has a protective function toward man and not toward the entire territory. Fiber is at the same level as watchfulness and, if it is accentuated, leads to an inadmissible independence for a defense dog. On the contrary, combativeness is at the highest degree, while aggressiveness is moderate because man must be able in any case to stop his own dog when it throws itself on another person to defend its owner. They are competitive in any circumstance; their courage is proverbial.” 

 

Perricone then gave the Cane Corso’s character map: 

 

Docility ••••• 

Sociability ••••• 

Temperament ••• 

Curiosity •••• 

Watchfulness ••• 

Fiber ••• 

Courage ••••• 

Aggressiveness ••• 

Possessiveness •••• 

Combativeness ••••• 

 

I am in complete agreement with Perricone. I also feel that the breed that was on the southern-Italian farm is fully capable of existing in this day and age. These “gifts” – docility, sociability, temperament, curiosity, watchfulness and fiber – are crucial to a psychologically balanced dog. 

 

Using these definitions, ENCI judge Dr. Danillo Georgio expanded on the breed’s virtues in his article “Nature of the Cane Corso.” “The best qualities or character components typifying the race of the Corsican dog are: 

 

combativeness, docility, sociability and general nervous balance. These endowments make the Corsican a staid, quiet, reflective dog,” he writes. “The Corsican dog’s nervous balance and its own firmness of nerves represent the breed’s true force and mental power born from an interior balance and therefore from a very good genetic substrate. This substrate needs to be increased more and more, checked by a proper breeding and balanced by the proper relationship Corso owner.” In the same article he describes the Corso as having “a quite vivacious nature, character with a tendency to hard, fairly good obedience but in close relation with the capabilities of its guide, marked sociability, aggressiveness towards its fellow dogs but relatively scarce towards man, very high fighting spirit, good watch, high curiosity as well as possessive character.” 

 

When giving breed seminars, I have been asked many times, “What do you love about this breed? Why the Cane Corso?” My answer has always been the unconditional love this breed gives its owner. To a Corso, its people are the sun and the moon. He is particularly sensitive to their moods and emotions. Corsos are not like Rottweilers, who would be inclined to challenge you for alpha status. The Cane Corso recognizes his master as the pack leader and 

will never challenge that; like a high-ranking wolf, he will defend his pack with vigor and tenacity while remaining subordinate to his family and leader. 

 

There is an inherent difference in the way a Cane Corso loves you, or at least that has been my experience. The breed has a profound attachment to humans, another one of its inherent gifts. A Corso suffers without the presence of his family, particularly the youngsters; he seems to know to change his tact when around them, instantly becoming gentler and calm. The Cane Corso is not a breed that can be just left out in the yard and forgotten about – that is the cruelest form of punishment. 

 

“The Corso is a particularly pliable dog and it feels the relationship with its owner very much. Its close following of man in every movement is characteristic, and it is always ready near his legs and alert to his voice,” wrote Dr. Paolo Breber, the man credited with starting the recovery of the Cane Corso. “Differently from other breeds, which accept to spend most of the day alone or with other dogs, content with only one or two hours of company, our dog suffers when it is separated from man; the conditions of a dog kennel are definitely adverse to it. This extraordinary harmony with its owner, together with its easy learning, combativeness and physical appearance, make it the ideal dog for whoever needs to defend himself and/or attack both men and dangerous animals.” 

 

The Cane Corso is not a typical Molosser in the sense that he is not exclusively defensive; while the 10-foot circumference around his humans is of paramount importance to him, he is also very environmental – in other words, he is also in tune with what is going on a hundred yards away on the horizon. Perhaps this behavior harkens back to his days of war with the wolf. He is not the finisher that a terrier can be; he will stop his attack if his adversary is beaten, content in taking just enough measure as needed to get the situation in hand. 

 

The Cane Corso is an extremely intelligent dog, easily trained. However, he is intelligent enough to understand when to overcome his training – what measure to take and to what extent. “His method of guarding is to remain near the house or his own quarters, leaving this space only for an occasional round. If his owner is not there, he will only rarely go to the fence or enclosure, even though strangers might be there; this makes it almost impossible for him to be harmed from the outside,” wrote Stefano Gandolfi and Gianantonio Sereni, who were involved in the early reconstitution of the breed. “He makes himself heard, with a low bark, but not seen. He waits for the intruder to violate his territory so that he can surprise him, arriving suddenly and rapidly like a shadow in the night, and he means trouble. If the intruder remains calm and motionless, the Cane Corso will call his owner with a rhythmic bark; if he make suspicious movements or tries to run the dog will immobilize him, becoming ever more aggressive in relation to the escape attempts of his victim.” 

 

The breed’s strength is its stability. Ideally, he should be like furniture, unnoticed and under control but ready to react if necessary. Here is a prime example: Several years ago at the Cane Corso Association of America national specialty, I was talking to my old friend Renzo Carosio. I was holding my bitch Diva; ironically, we were talking about her ideal temperament. Just then another friend of mine who is quite the jokester, Greg Weber, thought it would be funny to run up on me and put me in a bear hug. Well, Ms. Diva was having none of that, and reacted accordingly. A somewhat shaken Greg managed to get out of the way and looked at me as he said, “She was going to bite me!” Laughing, Renzo said, “Aaaahhh, Diva, this is very good!” That was the expected response to that situation; however, the true strength of the breed and of its temperament is that an hour later Greg was petting Diva and she was shaking paws with him. 

 

In the 1990s, the Cane Corso standard used to say “aloof with strangers.” Some judges took this to mean “hands off,” which was not the case. Nature versus nurture comes into play; the breed when socialized is perfectly accepting of examination. The Cane Corso may not be that dog that runs up to you and jumps all over you, but that is not what he was bred to do. Carosio once said to someone, “If you want a Poodle, get a Poodle,” and I wholeheartedly agree. The breed does not indiscriminately give its love away; it has to be earned. 

 

The Cane Corso can be belligerent toward other dogs, particularly of the same sex. A Corso is not likely to start a fight, but he is not likely to run from one, either. The breed also has a history as a combat dog. While the massaro did not participate in organized blood sport, the sight of two Cane Corsos locked in combat was not unheard of in the meridone. The spectacle has even been immortalized in the engravings of Bartolomeo Pinelli, the early-19th-Century Italian engraver who chronicled many of the breed’s exploits. The thinking was there was no better way to prove the merits of one’s line than through combat. The victor would display essential characteristics such as courage, resistance to pain, strength and aggression, which would validate the breeder’s work. 

 

Old-time Cane Corso breeder Umberto Leone recalled that “at one time fights were allowed between Corsos, and I had a male that was invincible. They came from Bari, Campobasso and from all over Foggia, but there were none that could beat him. He has a trigger like a feline; the second he saw his adversary, he would take off like lightning and grab him between the throat and ear. As long as he could breathe, he would not release. One time, a flock of sheep from Abruzzi passed next to my masseria. My Corso would hide in the grass and would ambush the mastini that accompanied the sheep. It would not bother the sheep. The mastini were reduced to the point that they had to hide between the sheep to get by.” 

 

As I mentioned earlier, these were not organized events: The spark might have been a quip or snide remark, or perhaps someone’s boast or challenge that would have to be put to the test. Whatever the reason, these fights were never to the death; the conquered was always spared. 

 

As any old-timer will tell you, the Cane Corso is not a professional fighter; he is only an amateur. While combat serves as a legitimate assessment of his natural abilities, it is not what he was bred for. 

 

I recall my first visit to Italy, during the international Associazione Italiana Cane Corso, or AICC, show in 2000. The final male class had 25 dogs, all proud and noble. Being stallions, there was more than one flare-up between contenders. Coming from American dog shows, where this type of behavior would never be tolerated, I was taken aback. “Is this normal?” I asked Alberto Cremonasi, who was on the AICC board of directors. 

 

“Si!” he replied. “Yes – molto character!” 

 

Correct character and temperament for the breed are easy to qualify. Then there is the age-old debate over what a breed was bred for versus the pressures modern society places on it to conform to a very litigious society, not to mention the restrictions of breed-specific legislation. Regarding temperament, the AKC standard says. “The Cane Corso as a protector of his property and owners is unequaled. Intelligent he is easily trained. Noble, majestic and powerful his presence is impressive. He is docile and affectionate to his owner, loving with children and family.” 

The Cane Corso survives today when so many of his contemporaries have become extinct because he is so adaptable and versatile. He is as capable of running a half-marathon as he is lying around watching television or going to the beach. As we have discussed, the Cane Corso has been gifted with many natural psychological gifts, an inherited template. Environment plays a key role in his development: If he is raised to be a family dog, that is what he will be. And if he is raised to do protection or guard work, he will excel at that as well. 

rtic 

Unfortunately, sometimes our beloved breed’s gifts are wasted. The Cane Corso should never be fearful, timid or indiscriminately aggressive. Nor should he be unpredictable. Some of this breed’s original vocation required that he travel with salesmen and accompany butchers to towns and villages; he drove cattle to slaughter, requiring that he be under control at all times. Dogs that did not have the strictest fiber would have never been bred in the old south, and that rule should still apply today. It is inconceivable to think of a dog afraid of his own shadow or a danger to his family would have been bred or fed back then: The peasants who kept the spark of this breed alive didn’t have an abundance of food for themselves, much less waste it on a trembling reflection of the proud Cane Corso. 

Let us never forget: If we lose the temperament, we lose the breed.